This collection contains 141 peer-reviewed papers on pipeline infrastructure that were presented at the Pipelines 2012 conference, held in Miami Beach, Florida, August 19-22, 2012.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 5<\/td>\n | Table of Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | Advances in Technology Performance Testing of Underground Storage Tank against Buckling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 31<\/td>\n | Organizing and Managing the Implementation of Large Diameter Tapping and Plugging Technology for a Major Sanitary Improvement Project in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 41<\/td>\n | Ductile Iron Corrosion Theories and Science <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 48<\/td>\n | Design and Development of a Web-Based National Database for Water and Wastewater Pipeline Infrastructure Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 58<\/td>\n | Fatigue of Plastic Water Pipe: A Technical Review with Recommendations for PE4710 Pipe Design Fatigue <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 81<\/td>\n | Novel Resilience Assessment Methodology for Water Distribution Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 90<\/td>\n | Contingency and Emergency: Prior Planning, \u201cReal Live” Execution, and Post Mortem of the Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 104<\/td>\n | Water Transmission Main Condition Assessment in the Last Frontier: A Magnanimous Endeavor for the Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 122<\/td>\n | Protection of Petroleum and Natural Gas Pipelines Crossing Debris Flow Watersheds\u2014A Case Study in the Qinling Mountains, Western China <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 138<\/td>\n | Meeting the Challenge of Pipeline Emergency Repair <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 148<\/td>\n | PressureCast Steel Pipe Combined Load Test Set-Up and Execution <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 156<\/td>\n | Unidirectional Flushing (UDF): It’s Not Just about Cleaning the System Anymore\u2014Benefits and Advantages That West Springfield, Massachusetts, Achieved with Their Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 167<\/td>\n | Transmission Main and Plastic Pipe Leak Detection Using Advanced Correlation Technology: Case Studies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 178<\/td>\n | Installation of a 42 Inch HDPE Pipeline at Seminole County’s Regional Water Treatment Facility at Yankee Lake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 187<\/td>\n | Risk Management in Real Time\u2014Transient Control Testing on a Large Conveyance System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 197<\/td>\n | Integration of HDPE 4710 Materials for Potable Water Distribution Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 206<\/td>\n | Five Years and Counting: The Evolution of WSSC’s PCCP Management Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 218<\/td>\n | City of Westminster’s Sewer Collection System Assessment Program: A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 229<\/td>\n | GIS: A Decision Making Tool for Pipeline Asset Management in Atlanta <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 238<\/td>\n | Intake Screen Alternatives for the IPL Project\u2014Planning for Mussels and Variable Intake Depths <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 251<\/td>\n | Variability of Pipe Coating Pull-Off Adhesion Measurements on Cylindrical Steel Pipelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 262<\/td>\n | Evaluation of Statically-Loaded Large Diameter Steel Pipe Embedded with Lime Stabilized Native Clay Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 277<\/td>\n | Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Water Pipelines: Part 1\u2014 Current Practice <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 288<\/td>\n | Coastal Issues Galveston’s Life Line\u2014Considerations When Designing an Aerial Crossing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 298<\/td>\n | Condition Assessment Who Says You Need Multiple Wire Breaks for a PCCP Pipe to Fail? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 308<\/td>\n | Condition Evaluation of Asbestos Cement Water Mains <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 318<\/td>\n | Numbers Don’t Lie: PCCP Performance and Deterioration Based on a Statistical Review of a Decade of Condition Assessment Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 327<\/td>\n | From Pilot to Permanent: Evolution of LWC’s PCCP Condition Assessment Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 339<\/td>\n | A Methodology for Condition Assessment of Pressure Water Mains <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 349<\/td>\n | Implementation of Sustainability Initiatives and the Envision Rating System on the Omaha CSO Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 359<\/td>\n | PCCP Condition Assessment Methodology: What Is Right for You? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 365<\/td>\n | Enhancing Asset Management Priority Ranking\u2014A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 376<\/td>\n | Condition Assessment of 23 Lift Stations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 398<\/td>\n | Integrated Monitoring Strategy for Large Diameter Pre- Stressed Concrete Pipelines\u2014A Case Study at Waternet, the Netherlands <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 408<\/td>\n | Protecting the Magic City <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 416<\/td>\n | Pilot Large Diameter Pipeline Seismic Fragility Assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 428<\/td>\n | Restoring Water Network Reliability and Control in the City of Baltimore <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 433<\/td>\n | New Approaches to Inspect Water Pipelines Running under Rivers, Lakes, Levies, and Critical Transport Infrastructure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 441<\/td>\n | Reducing the Cost of Failure: Time Is the Unforgiving Enemy during Pipeline Ruptures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 452<\/td>\n | The Problem of Leakage Detection on Large Diameter Mains <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 462<\/td>\n | Condition Assessment of a Ductile Iron Force Main Using Guided Wave Technology: Case Study of Underwood Creek Force Main, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 477<\/td>\n | Failure Risk of Bar-Wrapped Pipe with Broken Bars and Corroded Cylinder <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 488<\/td>\n | Sewer Main Condition Assessment in the Last Frontier <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 501<\/td>\n | LRFD Approach to CFRP Renewal of Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 514<\/td>\n | Rehabilitation of Large Diameter PCCP: Relining and Sliplining with Steel Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 525<\/td>\n | Miami-Dade Case Study: Managing and Minimizing Pipeline Outages through the Use of Carbon Fiber <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 535<\/td>\n | Field Comparison of the Axis Vacuum Microtunneling Technology vs. Open Cut Excavation in Glenview, Illinois <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 543<\/td>\n | Technology\u2014How Far Can We Go? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 551<\/td>\n | Southeast Collector Trunk Sewer Route Selection: The Regional Municipalities of York and Durham, Ontario, Canada <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 564<\/td>\n | Consideration of Embodied Energy in Sustainability Evaluation of Pipeline Projects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 572<\/td>\n | Chemical Amendment of Excavated Trench Material for Sustainable Reuse <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 582<\/td>\n | Condition Assessments Using Pipe Penetrating Radar: The Metro Wastewater Reclamation District, Denver, CO\u2014Harvard Gulch Interceptor Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 596<\/td>\n | Construction Route Selection for a $2.2 Billion Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 612<\/td>\n | Replacement of a Critical Water Supply Pipeline in a Dense Urban Landscape <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 622<\/td>\n | M-DWASD Design-Build Procurement for Government Cut Pipeline Replacement Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 633<\/td>\n | Stockton Delta Water Project Construction Challenges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 646<\/td>\n | A New Generation of FRP Laminates for Repair of Pipelines in the Gas Industry <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 654<\/td>\n | Design and Construction Challenges for a 36 Inch Diameter 18 Mile Reclaimed Water Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 664<\/td>\n | Two Successful Installations of Large Diameter Rigid-Design Concrete Pressure Pipelines in Very Soft Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 675<\/td>\n | Augmenting Owner’s Staff with As-Needed Contracts for Large Diameter Pipeline Construction Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 681<\/td>\n | Pipeline Infrastructure Renewal at Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 692<\/td>\n | Delivering a Critical Raw Water Transmission Line Using Design-Build: The Perspective from Gilbert, AZ <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 702<\/td>\n | From Tiny Hole to Huge Problem Overnight\u2014Emergency Culvert Pipe Repair <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 711<\/td>\n | Lessons Learned from the Commissioning of a 21,000 HP Pump Station in San Diego <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 720<\/td>\n | Hiding a 96 Inch Pipeline in Your Neighbor’s Backyard <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 733<\/td>\n | Pipe Collapse in an Amusement Park\u2014Now What Do You Do? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 743<\/td>\n | San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s Water System Improvement Program: Bay Division Pipeline 5 East Bay Reaches\u2014Construction Contract Challenges in a Difficult Economy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 757<\/td>\n | 60″ Demonstration Installation of PressureCast Steel Pipe for the Tarrant Regional Water District <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 766<\/td>\n | Replacing Live Pipelines\u2014Planning for Construction Issues and Sequencing Can Keep Your System Up and Running <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 777<\/td>\n | Recycled Water for the Thirsty High Desert <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 791<\/td>\n | Longest Polyurethane Lined and Coated Steel Pipeline in North America: The Provo Reservoir Canal Enclosure Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 803<\/td>\n | Experimental Examination of Selected Limit States of Structural Liners at Locations of Ring Fracture <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 815<\/td>\n | Reconstruction in an Urban Environment: Kimberley Lane 8″ Water Line HDD and 54″ Sanitary Sewer CIPP Rehabilitation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 825<\/td>\n | Basis of Design for Proposed 42 Inch Reclaimed Water Main <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 836<\/td>\n | Repair of a Punctured 48 in. Diameter Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe on a Sixty Degree Slope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 847<\/td>\n | Getting Ready for a Larger Panama Canal\u2014Assessing a Critical Large Diameter Force Main <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 856<\/td>\n | Buried Flexible Pipes: Deflections and Stresses Caused by an Increase in Soil Cover\u2014Highway Crossing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 866<\/td>\n | Proactive Upgrade of Steel Pipelines during Scheduled Plant Outages <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 877<\/td>\n | Case Study of Productivity Analysis for Horizontal Directional Drilling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 889<\/td>\n | Design Management The Effects of Pipe Stiffness on HDD Pull Loads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 899<\/td>\n | Sustainable Flowable Fill <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 909<\/td>\n | How to Accelerate Design and Construction for Large Water Supply Projects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 921<\/td>\n | Collaborative Bidding Approach for the Tollgate Creek Interceptor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 928<\/td>\n | Three Heads Are Better Than One: Efficient Solutions to Achieve the Best Value for a 6 Mile Water Main in an Urban Setting <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 938<\/td>\n | Planning and Modeling Solutions for a Complex Collection System: The Baton Rouge SSO Control and Wastewater Facilities Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 948<\/td>\n | Pipe Materials and Joint Selection for Trenchless Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 960<\/td>\n | Classification and Specification of Bedding and Backfill for Buried Pipelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 972<\/td>\n | Tangent Outlet Design for Welded Steel Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 984<\/td>\n | Molecular Design of High Density Polyethylene for Pipes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 994<\/td>\n | Reinforced Concrete Pipe Design under Extreme Loading Conditions Using ASCE Standard 15-98 and Beyond <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1003<\/td>\n | Untangling the Mysteries of Air Valves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1010<\/td>\n | Hydraulic Modeling for Emergency Water Supply and Disaster Planning <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1016<\/td>\n | Finite Element Analysis of Combined-Load Performance of PressureCast Steel Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1035<\/td>\n | Dynamic Behavior of Buried Flexible Pipes of Varying Thickness Using the Shaking Table Test <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1045<\/td>\n | Designing a Critical Interceptor in an Earthquake Prone Floodplain with Limited Access: The Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1056<\/td>\n | Selecting Water Main Materials for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1066<\/td>\n | Common and Challenging Questions in Water System Infrastructure Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1093<\/td>\n | Emergency Relocation of 20 Inch Sewer Force Main (HDD) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1104<\/td>\n | Introducing a New Honeycomb-FRP Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1112<\/td>\n | Structural Design of Buried Pipes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1124<\/td>\n | Surge in a Bi-Directional 48″ Steel, Potable Water Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1135<\/td>\n | Failure Mechanisms Design to Prevent Long Running Cracks in Plastic Pipe for Water Applications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1142<\/td>\n | Operations and Maintenance Scoring and Selecting Rehabilitation Methodologies: How to Pick the Winning Number? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1149<\/td>\n | Proven Pipeline Rehabilitation System Using Steel Liners for the San Diego County Water Authority <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1156<\/td>\n | Pipe Performance and Experiences during Seismic Events in New Zealand over the Last 25 Years <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1167<\/td>\n | Steel Cylinder Reinforcement (SCR) for Pipeline Repair or Upgrades <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1176<\/td>\n | Determining the Effectiveness of Chlorine-Based Biofilm Control in Large Diameter Pipelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1188<\/td>\n | Large Steel Penstock Relining: The Blue Ridge Dam Rehabilitation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1196<\/td>\n | Cathodic Protection of Ductile Iron and Steel Water Pipelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1202<\/td>\n | The Design and Construction Considerations for PCCP Rehabilitation Using FRP Composites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1212<\/td>\n | The Development of a Novel Steel Reinforced Composite (SRC) Liner for the Rehabilitation of Deteriorated PCCP <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1223<\/td>\n | Can It Handle the Pressure? Condition Assessment, Structural Evaluation, and Repair of an Existing 72 Inch PCCP Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1234<\/td>\n | Beyond the Wires: A Sustainable Approach to Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1243<\/td>\n | Redeveloping Phoenix’s PCCP Assessment Program: A Pragmatic Approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1253<\/td>\n | Interaction of Water Transport Pipelines with Their Surroundings and Third Party Activities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1265<\/td>\n | Innovative Condition Assessment of Strategic Aqueducts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1276<\/td>\n | Study on the Applicability of Currently Used Soil-Pipe Interaction Equations for Segmented Buried Pipelines Subjected to Fault Movement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1285<\/td>\n | Answering 5 Basic Asset Management Questions for Pre-Stressed Concrete Water Transport Mains <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1299<\/td>\n | Refurbishment of the Vyrnwy Large Diameter Trunk Main <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1309<\/td>\n | Synthesis-Analysis of Water and Wastewater Pipeline Condition Assessment and Renewal Engineering Technologies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1317<\/td>\n | Effect of Wire Breaks on Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe (PCCP) Reinforced with Steel Liners\u2014A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1327<\/td>\n | Lessons Learned from the Multi-Year Assessment of the Homestake Transmission Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1339<\/td>\n | Locating Water Main Leaks in Texas to Conserve Resources during Times of Drought <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1348<\/td>\n | Estimating Residual Strength of Deteriorated 96″ Interceptor and Strength Enhancement Provided by Lining Methods Using Computer Modeling and Forensic Investigation Tools <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1363<\/td>\n | A New Generation of Back-Reamers for HDD Installations in Cohesive and Fine to Medium Coarse Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1375<\/td>\n | Physical Evaluation of the Dissipation of a Concentrated Load When Applied to Reinforced Concrete Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1388<\/td>\n | CFRP Repair and Strengthening of PCCP for Thrust Restraint <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1397<\/td>\n | Mapping Utility Infrastructure via Underground GPS Positioning with Autonomous Telerobotics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1411<\/td>\n | WSSC’s Systematic Approach to the CFRP Liner Installation Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1422<\/td>\n | Santa Fe Irrigation District (SFID): Group 1 PRS and Valve Replacement Project J921 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1428<\/td>\n | Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha PCCP Asset Management Advancements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1438<\/td>\n | Combining CFRP Lining Systems with Other Pipeline Rehabilitation Technologies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1448<\/td>\n | Pipeline Hydraulics and Modeling Upper Feeder and San Gabriel Canyon Valve Structure: Hydraulic Transient Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1458<\/td>\n | Planning and Coordination Opportunities Progress toward a Unified Thrust Restraint Design\u2014An Update <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1470<\/td>\n | Design-Build of Wastewater Force-Main in North Bay Village: Lessons Learned from the Design-Build Team’s Perspective <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1485<\/td>\n | Predictive Modeling Two-Step Subsurface Characterization Process for Pipeline Project in Texas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1495<\/td>\n | Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe (PCCP) Condition Assessment of LWC’s B.E. Payne 60″ PCCP Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1507<\/td>\n | Procurement Alternatives Minden Uses Competitive Bidding with Alternate Pipe Materials on Large Diameter Regional Water System Work <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1517<\/td>\n | Rehabilitative Approaches HDD Matches Installation Method to Long and Difficult Pipe Crossing in Macon, GA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1527<\/td>\n | Trenchless Evaluation Comparison of Jacking Load Models for Trenchless Pipe Jacking <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1541<\/td>\n | Assessing Sustainability of Pipeline Projects Using Envision Rating System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Pipelines 2012 – Innovations in Design, Construction, Operations, and Maintenance, Doing More with Less<\/b><\/p>\n |