| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 6<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 8<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 9<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 10<\/td>\n | 3 Symbols and units Tables Table 1 \u2013 Symbols and units <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 11<\/td>\n | 4 Sequence of work <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 12<\/td>\n | 5 Limitations of this technical specification 6 Description of wave energy conversion (WEC) technology 7 Assess and characterize wave resource related to Location 1 and Location 2 7.1 General 7.2 Ambient condition 7.3 Wave resource at Location 1 and Location 2 8 WEC power capture data at Location 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 13<\/td>\n | 9 WEC model validation 9.1 General 9.2 Bin selection 9.3 Error per bin 9.4 MAEP error <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 14<\/td>\n | 9.5 Accounting for PTO losses 10 Modifications to the WEC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 15<\/td>\n | 11 Calculate capture length matrix for use at Location 2 11.1 Evaluate appropriate dimensionality of the capture length matrix at Location 2 11.2 Calculate information for each bin of the capture length matrix <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 16<\/td>\n | 12 Quality assurance for cells based on measurements at Location 1 13 Complement capture length matrix to cover range of conditions at Location 2 13.1 Capture length matrix complementation requirement 13.2 Interpolation or extrapolation of the capture length matrix 13.3 Numerical model 13.4 Use of physical model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | 14 Calculate MAEP at Location 2 using complemented capture length matrix and Location 2 resource data 15 Assessment of confidence <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative) Example analysis A.1 General A.2 Description of the WEC technology (Clause 6) Figures Figure A.1 \u2013 The Wavestar prototype (diameter of each float is 5 m) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 20<\/td>\n | A.3 Assess and characterize wave resource related to Location 1 and Location 2 (Clause 7) Figure A.2 \u2013 Map showing Location 1 Hanstholm and Location 2 Fjatring Table A.1 \u2013 Locations 1 and 2, basic information <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | A.4 Assess and characterize wave resource at Location 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 22<\/td>\n | A.5 Assess and characterize wave resource at Location 2 Figure A.3 \u2013 Location 1 Wave Energy Flux Matrix, Hantsholm, Denmark (based on measured data from Wavestar prototype Feb 2012 \u2013 Jan 2013) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 23<\/td>\n | A.6 WEC power capture data at Location 1 (Clause 8) Figure A.4 \u2013 Location 2 Wave Energy Flux Matrix, Buoy 2031 (Fjaltring, Denmark) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 24<\/td>\n | A.7 WEC model validation (Clause 9) Figure A.5 \u2013 Wavestar prototype capture length matrix Location 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 25<\/td>\n | Figure A.6 \u2013 Numerically modelled electrical power matrix, adapted from [2] <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 26<\/td>\n | A.8 Calculate capture length matrix for use at Location 2 (Clause 11) A.8.1 Assess the appropriate dimensionality of the capture length matrix at Location 2 (11.1) A.8.2 Calculate information for each bin of the capture length matrix (11.2) A.9 Perform quality assurance on capture length matrix for application at Location 2 (Clause 12) Figure A.7 \u2013 Model validation indicating percent difference in capture length between observations and model (model-observations) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 27<\/td>\n | A.10 Complement capture length matrix to cover range of conditions at Location 2 (Clause 13) Figure A.8 \u2013 Wavestar prototype capture length matrixfor Loaction 2. Fjaltring, Denmark <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 28<\/td>\n | A.11 Calculate MAEP at Location 2 using complemented capture length matrix and Location 2 resource data (Clause 14) A.12 Assessment of confidence Table A.2 \u2013 Table of MAEP contributions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative) Power take off efficiency B.1 General B.2 Absorbed power B.3 Power take off efficiency Figure B.1 \u2013 Overview of the PTO system used in the prototype of Wavestar <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 31<\/td>\n | Annex C (informative) Example calculation of PTO efficiency Table C.1 \u2013 Example records including wave conditions, absorbed and electrical power and resultant PTO efficiency <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 32<\/td>\n | Figure C.1 \u2013 PTO efficiency matrix for the Wavestar prototype at Location 1, Hantsholm, Denmark <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 33<\/td>\n | Annex D (informative) Sources of uncertainty for MAEP at Location 2 D.1 Comparisons between Location 1 and Location 2 D.2 Bathymetry and water depth D.3 Current <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 34<\/td>\n | D.4 Wave spectrum D.5 Wave direction and short-crested waves D.6 Wave converter modifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 35<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Marine energy. Wave, tidal and other water current converters – Wave energy converter power performance assessment at a second location using measured assessment data<\/b><\/p>\n |