This collection contains 128 papers on watershed management presented at the 2010 Watershed Management Conference, held in Madison, Wisconsin, August 23-27, 2010.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 6<\/td>\n | Table of Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | Climate Change A Model for Evaluating Stream Temperature Response to Climate Change Scenarios in Wisconsin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | An Approach to Estimating Hydropower Impacts of Climate Change from a Regional Perspective <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 41<\/td>\n | Assessment of Variation in Austin Water Demands under Changing Climate Conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 51<\/td>\n | Climate Change and TMDLs: Anticipating Potential Effects\/Weighing Options <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 62<\/td>\n | Determining and Mitigating the Impacts of Climate Change on Stormwater Management and Hydrology in Wisconsin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 75<\/td>\n | Effects of Climate Change on the National Flood Insurance Program in the United States\u2014Riverine Flooding <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 85<\/td>\n | Evaluating the Potential Effects of Climate Change on Thermal Discharges to a Large-Scale River <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 98<\/td>\n | Impact of Climate and Land Use Changes on Aquatic Habitats <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 107<\/td>\n | Incorporating Climate Change Impacts into the Columbia River Treaty 2014\/2024 Review <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 119<\/td>\n | Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: Tradeoffs between Ecosystem Carbon Sequestration and Water Yield <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 131<\/td>\n | Statewide Water Supply Planning: Addressing Future Uncertainties with Flexible Watershed Assessments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 142<\/td>\n | The Value of International Collaborations in Understanding How Climate Change Affects Water Supplies from Snow Dominated Catchments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 151<\/td>\n | Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change in an Irrigated Agricultural Basin in Semi Arid Chile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 163<\/td>\n | Economics and Water Resource Decision Making A Linear Programming Optimization of Water Resource Management with Virtual Water through Global Trade: A Case Study of Germany <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 175<\/td>\n | Climate Change Economic Impacts on Supply of Water for the M&I Sector in the Metropolitan Region of Chile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 187<\/td>\n | Connecting the Science and Economics of Watershed Pollution Abatement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 199<\/td>\n | Economic Benefits of Renewable Energy Sources: Willingness to Pay for Geothermal Energy in Yozgat Province, Turkey <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 208<\/td>\n | Hydro Economic Modeling to Support Water Resources Management and Irrigated Bio Fuel Crops Production <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 220<\/td>\n | Identifying and Implementing Funding Alternatives for Watershed and Stormwater Management Programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 229<\/td>\n | Hydrodynamic Modeling A New Coupled Optimization-Hydraulic Routing Model for Real-Time Operation of Regulated River Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 241<\/td>\n | Diffusion Wave Based Modeling of Watershed for Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield Using FEM, GIS, and Remotely Sensed Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 252<\/td>\n | Flood Risk Assessment of Complex Riverine Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 264<\/td>\n | A Hydraulic Modeling Framework for Producing Urban Flooding Maps in Zanesville, Ohio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 274<\/td>\n | The Impact of Navigation Chevrons in St. Louis Harbor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 281<\/td>\n | Hydrologic Restoration A Comprehensive Solution to Aquatic Habitat Fragmentation in the Milwaukee River Watershed, Ozaukee County, Wisconsin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 293<\/td>\n | A Simplified Method for Estimating Habitat Output for the Riverview Park Side Channel Restoration, Kent, Washington <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 307<\/td>\n | A Strategy to Minimize Sediment Delivery to a Wetland Restoration at Juanita Beach Park in Kirkland, Washington <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 319<\/td>\n | A Watershed Approach to Stream Assessment and Restoration in an Urban Water Supply Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 325<\/td>\n | Adaptive Watershed Management\u2014Development of Phased Watershed Restoration Plans for the Kinnickinnic River and the Menomonee River Watersheds <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 337<\/td>\n | Apple Creek Channel Relocation and Floodplain Lowering <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 349<\/td>\n | Attenuating Excessive Sediment and Loss of Biotic Habitat in an Intensively Managed Midwestern Agricultural Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 359<\/td>\n | Challenges and Successes of Tidal Wetlands Restoration in Jamaica Bay, New York <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 380<\/td>\n | Effect of Channel Restoration on Flood Wave Attenuation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 392<\/td>\n | Engineered Groundwater Recharge As Mitigation for Reduced Summer Low-Flow in the Upper Mattole River Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 404<\/td>\n | Fish Passage Restoration and the NEPA Process: Balancing Environmental Considerations with Historical and Cultural Resources <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 413<\/td>\n | Innovative Methods of Integrating Conservation Planning Methods, Conceptual Ecological Models, USACE Planning Requirements, and NEPA to Develop a Comprehensive Plan: Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 425<\/td>\n | Management of Surface Water and Groundwater Withdrawals to Maintain Environmental Stream Flows in Michigan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 437<\/td>\n | Managing Water Levels in Ecosystem Restoration Areas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 447<\/td>\n | Navigation, Flood Risk Management, and Mississippi River Ecosystem Rehabilitation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 459<\/td>\n | Numerical Simulation of the Effects of the Urbanization on the Poyang Wetlands <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 465<\/td>\n | Removing Barriers to Fish Passage at the City of Bellingham\u2019s Middle Fork Nooksack River Diversion Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 473<\/td>\n | Stream Relocation Design and Monitoring in a Rapidly Urbanizing Watershed: EFWLC, Indianapolis, Indiana <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 485<\/td>\n | Study of Artificial Flood Generation for Ecological Stream Flow Recovery Downstream of Irap\u00e9 Dam, Brazil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 496<\/td>\n | The Unique Components of the West Branch Wetland Restoration Area\u2014DuPage County, Illinois <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 505<\/td>\n | Underwood Creek Rehabilitation and Flood Management Phase 1\u2014Final Design and Construction: Milwaukee, Wisconsin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 517<\/td>\n | Stochastic and Statistical Methods A Comparison of ESP and Stochastic Methods for Streamflow Ensemble Forecasts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 524<\/td>\n | Applications of Artificial Neural Networks in Urban Water System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 536<\/td>\n | Developing Fecal TMDLs for Watershed Management Using Fuzzy Based Approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 545<\/td>\n | Interannual-to-Daily Multiscale Stream Flow Models with Climatic Effects to Simulate Surface Water Supply Availability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 557<\/td>\n | Stormwater Management A Nonpoint Source Pollutant Loading Model for Small Suburban Watersheds <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 568<\/td>\n | Automation Innovations in Stormwater Modeling Case Study: City of Ramsey, Minnesota, Surface Water Management Plan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 579<\/td>\n | Effects of Detention Basin Release Rates on Flood Flows: Application of a Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN Model to an Urbanizing Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 591<\/td>\n | Engineered Bioretention Media for Industrial Stormwater Treatment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 603<\/td>\n | Enhanced Biofilter Treatment of Urban Stormwater by Optimizing the Hydraulic Residence Time in the Media <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 614<\/td>\n | Equitable Credits for Stormwater Fee Assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 626<\/td>\n | How the Application of Environment Site Design Strategies and Low Impact Development Storm Water Treatment Systems Can Mimic the Natural Hydrologic Conditions in a Watershed and Provide a Resource for Carbon Sequestering <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 636<\/td>\n | Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis for a Drainage Rehabilitation Project on Interstate Highway 80 in California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 647<\/td>\n | Integrated Modeling of Green Infrastructure Components in an Area Served by Combined Sewers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 659<\/td>\n | Johnson County Stormwater Management Program\u2014Shifting Focus from Flood Mitigation to Achieving Multiple Water Quantity and Quality Goals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 672<\/td>\n | LID Policy Innovations for Watershed Management in Retrofitting an Ultra-Urban Infrastructure: Addressing Water Quantity and Quality Challenges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 686<\/td>\n | Managing Stormwater Pollutants from a Heavy Manufacturing Site: Monitoring, Modeling, and Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 699<\/td>\n | Mastering Stormwater Management: A Decade of Growth <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 708<\/td>\n | Modeling the Effectiveness of Maryland\u2019s Environmental Site Design Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 718<\/td>\n | Multi-Objective Management and Planning for Urban Watersheds <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 737<\/td>\n | Multi-Stakeholder Planning for Stormwater Management in the Lake Wingra Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 749<\/td>\n | Municipal Stormwater Permit Compliance in Wisconsin: Calculating Pollutant Loads and Selecting Best Management Practices across Multiple Watersheds Simultaneously <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 762<\/td>\n | Nitrogen Reduction for Transitional Land Uses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 774<\/td>\n | Reuse of Unusable Land for a Stormwater Detention Pond <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 783<\/td>\n | Runoff and Infiltration Dynamics on Pervious Paver Surfaces <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 790<\/td>\n | Selecting Stormwater (Bio)Filtration Sites and Soil-Based Media <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 802<\/td>\n | Sizing Cooling Water Discharge System to Control Water Quality Impacts of Tritium Releases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 814<\/td>\n | Sustainable Stormwater Enhancements in an Industrial Area <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 823<\/td>\n | The Challenges of Mitigating Hydrologic Impacts of Development: Lessons Learned in Dane County, Wisconsin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 833<\/td>\n | The Importance of Assessing Pollutant Loads from Land Development Projects and the Design of Effective Storm Water Treatment Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 844<\/td>\n | Using LID Retrofits for Flood Control and to Achieve Receiving Water Quality Standards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 854<\/td>\n | Water-Sensitive Urban Design: An Integral Piece of Ecological Sustainable Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 866<\/td>\n | Water Quality Measurement Determining the Effects of Rainfall-Runoff on Soil Surface Roughness and Erosion Processes via a Laser Scanner <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 874<\/td>\n | Developing Site-Specific Total Suspended Solids Criteria for the Cheyenne River, South Dakota <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 886<\/td>\n | In Situ Sensors for Measuring Pollutant Loads in Urban Streams and Evaluating Stormwater BMP Performance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 896<\/td>\n | Mitigating Hydrologic Impacts of Site Redevelopment: Northern Wood Power at Schiller Station\u2014A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 908<\/td>\n | Modeling Best Management Practices (BMPs) with HSPF <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 915<\/td>\n | Snowmelt and Agricultural Runoff: Load Quantification and Event Timing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 923<\/td>\n | Temporal Variations in Nutrient Fluxes in Agricultural Drains and Ditches <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 935<\/td>\n | Watershed Management Achieving Livestock and Poultry Nutrient Runoff Reductions through Voluntary Farm Assistance Programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 945<\/td>\n | An Integrated Approach to Water Resource Planning in Southern California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 956<\/td>\n | Impact Assessment of Natural Gas Production in the NYC Water Supply Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 968<\/td>\n | Development of a Coastal Systems Operations Center for the Institutional Strengthening of Coastal Management along the Romanian Black Sea <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 982<\/td>\n | Integrating Water Infrastructure in a New Paradigm for Sustainable, Resilient Communities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 994<\/td>\n | Land Use Change and Its Impact on Water Resources in East River Basin, South China <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1006<\/td>\n | Managing Dam Sediments: Rudimentary Sediment Budgets As a Practical Method for Assessing Risks to Aquatic Resources <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1018<\/td>\n | Real-Time Integrated Watershed Management of the Big Cypress Basin, Florida <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1029<\/td>\n | Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System for Assessment, Monitoring, and Management of Flooded and Waterlogged Areas, North District of Tripura State, India <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1041<\/td>\n | Sensitivity Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Environmental Impact of Biofuel Production in the Upper Mississippi River Basin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1053<\/td>\n | Two Alternative Approaches to Watershed Protection in the State of Arkansas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1065<\/td>\n | Water Resources Improvement in Southeast Afghanistan: Remote Project Planning and Decision Support Modeling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1081<\/td>\n | Watershed Planning for Sustainable Water Resources in the Ohio River Basin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1094<\/td>\n | Watershed Study of the Iowa-Cedar River Basin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1105<\/td>\n | Watershed Modeling A Mechanistic Model to Simulate Rill Erosion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1117<\/td>\n | A Watershed Modeling Tool, HEC-WAT <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1129<\/td>\n | An Improved Method for Watershed Delineation and Computation of Surface Depression Storage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1139<\/td>\n | Application of Data Assimilation with the Root Zone Water Quality Model for Soil Moisture Profile Estimation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1151<\/td>\n | Application of Inflow Design Flood Analysis to the Analysis and Design of High Hazard Dams in NRCS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1163<\/td>\n | Assimilating Remotely Sensed Surface Soil Moisture into SWAT Using Ensemble Kalman Filter <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1175<\/td>\n | Comparison of Uncertainty Analysis for Community Based Watershed Models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1183<\/td>\n | Component-Based Modeling of Watershed Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1195<\/td>\n | Development of an Environmental Observational Database to Minimize the Gap between Science and Practice <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1206<\/td>\n | Evaluating Effectiveness of Best Management Practices to Control Accelerated Sedimentation of the Morro Bay Estuary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1218<\/td>\n | Event Based Efficiency of Grassed Waterways in Reducing Sediment Yield within an Agricultural Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1230<\/td>\n | How \u201cCritical\u201d\u009d is Critical Duration in Determining Flood Risk, Flood Damages, and Stormwater Management Solutions? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1242<\/td>\n | HSPF Snow Modeling Parameters in an Urban Setting: Evaluation Using NWS Coop and SNODAS Snow Data and Re-Calibration Using PEST <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1254<\/td>\n | Hydrologic Analysis for a Hyper-Arid Region in the Middle East <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1264<\/td>\n | Hydrologic Analysis of Flash Floods in Sana\u2019a, Yemen <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1276<\/td>\n | Impacts of Radar Indicated Rainfall on Distributed Rainfall-Runoff Modeling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1286<\/td>\n | Initiation of the Upper Mississippi River Basin Observatory <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1298<\/td>\n | Innovative Percolation Modeling for Floodplains <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1310<\/td>\n | The AGWA-KINEROS2 Suite of Modeling Tools <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1322<\/td>\n | Modeling Framework for Balancing Water Supply, Water Quality, and Environmental Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1332<\/td>\n | Modeling the Impacts of Hydromodifcation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1344<\/td>\n | Modeling the Thermal Impact of Land Use Change in the Vermillion River Trout Stream Watershed, MN <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1356<\/td>\n | Modeling Watershed and Riverine Sediment Processes with HECHMS and HEC-RAS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1366<\/td>\n | Nationwide Watershed Modeling to Evaluate Potential Impacts of Climate and Land Use Change on Hydrology and Water Quality <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1378<\/td>\n | Of Rainfall Simulators, Infiltration Rates, and Curve Numbers: A Southwest Experience <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1390<\/td>\n | Selecting Temporal Precipitation Distributions for Watershed Modeling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1399<\/td>\n | The Development and Evaluation of Alternative Erosion Control and Flood Control Projects to Support the Calumet-Sag Detailed Watershed Plan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1410<\/td>\n | Updated Hydrologic Model Development for the Little Calumet River Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1421<\/td>\n | Verification of Large Scale Watershed Modeling Analysis Using Small Subwatershed Models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1433<\/td>\n | Vermillion River Watershed Hydrologic Study of Existing Conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1445<\/td>\n | Water Supply-Water Quality Model Framework for Watershed and Reservoir Planning and Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1451<\/td>\n | Author Index A <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1452<\/td>\n | B <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1454<\/td>\n | C <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1456<\/td>\n | D <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1457<\/td>\n | E <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1458<\/td>\n | F <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1459<\/td>\n | G <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1460<\/td>\n | H <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1462<\/td>\n | I J <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1463<\/td>\n | K <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1464<\/td>\n | L <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1466<\/td>\n | M <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1470<\/td>\n | N <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1471<\/td>\n | O P <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1473<\/td>\n | Q R <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1475<\/td>\n | S <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1478<\/td>\n | T <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1479<\/td>\n | U V <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1480<\/td>\n | W <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1481<\/td>\n | Y <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1482<\/td>\n | Z <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Watershed Management 2010<\/b><\/p>\n |