{"id":78788,"date":"2024-10-17T18:25:29","date_gmt":"2024-10-17T18:25:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asce-9780784408544-2006\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T19:38:08","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T19:38:08","slug":"asce-9780784408544-2006","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asce\/asce-9780784408544-2006\/","title":{"rendered":"ASCE 9780784408544 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"
held in Chicago, Illinois, July 30<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | Hydraulic Design Design of Hydraulic Structures for a 350 MGD Water Supply System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | Case Studies in Transient Pressure Monitoring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | Integrated Use of City\u2019s GIS Data and Hydraulic Model Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | Surge Control Strategies for the Sacramento Lower Northwest Interceptor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | East Fork Water Supply Project, Conveyance Pipeline: Review of Design Options for Flow Metering and Lake Lavon Outfall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | Groundwater Transfer Program: North Harris County Regional Water Authority <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
86<\/td>\n | Pipeline Asset Management Too Much Excitement under Highway 87 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | Condition Assessment of Norfolk\u2019s 36-Inch Raw Water Mains: Rehabilitation vs. Replacement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | Assessing and Managing PCCP Water Transmission Mains, Baltimore County, Maryland\u2014A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
114<\/td>\n | Fiber Optic Sensors for Acoustic Monitoring of PCCP <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
122<\/td>\n | Collection System Asset Management\u2014Benchmarking Performance through Annual Reporting <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
128<\/td>\n | RFEC\/TC Inspection of PCCP with no Shorting Straps at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
140<\/td>\n | Asset Management Strategies for Metallic Municipal Transmission Pipelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
148<\/td>\n | Pinpointing Exfiltration in Large Diameter Pressurized Wastewater Pipelines with the Sahara Tethered System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
156<\/td>\n | Hydraulic Transients with Genetic Algorithms Used for Leakage Detection in Real Water Distribution Networks <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
165<\/td>\n | Scattergraph Principles and Practice: Tools and Techniques to Evaluate Sewer Capacity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
173<\/td>\n | Scattergraph Principles and Practice: Practical Application of the Froude Number to Flow Monitoring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
183<\/td>\n | Field Application of Sewer Electro-Scan in Large Pipe Condition Assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
191<\/td>\n | A Non-Destructive Method for Structural Evaluation of Pipeline Suspension Bridges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
200<\/td>\n | Determining Base Infiltration in Sewers: A Comparison of Empirical Methods and Verification Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
213<\/td>\n | Comparison of Identified Distress in CCP Pipelines Operated by Water Utilities in North America <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
221<\/td>\n | An Integrated Dynamic Approach to PCCP Integrity Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
230<\/td>\n | Development of a PCCP Management Plan Using Sonic\/Ultrasonic Nondestructive Testing Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
238<\/td>\n | Financial Benefits from Seven Years of Water Loss Control Utilizing the Sahara® System at Thames Water in the United Kingdom <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
245<\/td>\n | Developments in a Free-Swimming Acoustic Leak Detection System for Water Transmission Pipelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
253<\/td>\n | GLSD Asset Management of an \u201cAt Risk\u201d\u009d PCCP Force Main <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
261<\/td>\n | Assessment Model of Water Main Conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
269<\/td>\n | Pipeline Construction Management Overview of Design and Construction of the Northern Water Supply System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
277<\/td>\n | Setting the Construction Priorities of the Routes in a Common Duct Network <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
285<\/td>\n | How One Large Water Utility Self-Performs Construction Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
294<\/td>\n | Leak Detection in Large Diameter Fiberglass Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
302<\/td>\n | The Great Man-Made River Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
310<\/td>\n | Horizontal Directional Drilling Utilizing 36-Inch Flexible Restrained Joint Ductile Iron Pipe\u2014A Successful First Experience <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
318<\/td>\n | Managing Fast Track Design and Construction Projects\u2014How to Stay on Schedule and within Budget <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
326<\/td>\n | Cleveland, Ohio\u2019s 108 Inch Outfall\u2014A Special Marine Achievement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
334<\/td>\n | An Explanation of ISO Registration: What Does it Give Your Pipeline Project? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
338<\/td>\n | Some Lessons Learned from Failure of a Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
347<\/td>\n | Pipeline Construction Management\u2014Pitfalls, Contract Traps, and Conflicts: How to Recognize and Avoid Them <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
355<\/td>\n | Pipeline Durability Considerations Thrust Restraint Behavior of Pipelines with Mechanically Harnessed Joints <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
362<\/td>\n | PCCP Carbon-Fiber-Liner Repair-Standard-Specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
370<\/td>\n | Pipeline Contactor for the City of Wichita, Kansas High Pressure Ozone Facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
380<\/td>\n | Steel Water Pipe Joint Testing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
395<\/td>\n | Development of Fabric-Wrapping Technique for Leaking Pipeline Joints under Roadway Pavement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
403<\/td>\n | Cypress Creek Transmission Main\u2014Last Major Link in Tampa Bay Water\u2019s Regional Pipeline System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
412<\/td>\n | An Investigation into the History and Use of Welded Lap Joints for Steel Water Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
421<\/td>\n | Establishing 100-Year Service Life for Corrugated HDPE Drainage Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
429<\/td>\n | Repair of PCCP by Post Tensioning <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
434<\/td>\n | Advancements in Steel Making and the Effect on Pipeline Specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
441<\/td>\n | Ultimate Strength Prediction of Steel Liners Using Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
450<\/td>\n | Assessment of Damage to Urban Buried Infrastructure in the Aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
458<\/td>\n | Behavior of Thermoplastic Liners within Degraded Concrete Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
465<\/td>\n | Ductile Iron Pipe: Proven Synergistic Corrosion Protection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
481<\/td>\n | Pipeline Infrastructure Renewal Eden Park Feeder Replacement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
489<\/td>\n | The Ayr Storm Outfall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
500<\/td>\n | Rehabilitation of Existing 24, 30, and 36-Inch Waterline in High Traffic Areas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
508<\/td>\n | Rehabilitation of a 72-Inch PCCP Transmission Main in Phoenix, AZ <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
520<\/td>\n | Meeting the Standard\u2014Air Release Valve and PCCP Rehabilitation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
528<\/td>\n | Structural Rehabilitation of Semi Elliptical Concrete Sewers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
535<\/td>\n | The Failure Behavior of an Epoxy Resin Subject to Multiaxial Loading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
543<\/td>\n | Preference Trade-Offs in Choosing Domestic Plumbing Materials <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
551<\/td>\n | Sewer Pipe Infiltration Assessment: Comparison of Electro-Scan, Joint Pressure Testing, and CCTV Inspection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
561<\/td>\n | Steel Liners in Large Diameter Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe: Calleguas Municipal Water District\u2019s 2005 Failure, Repair, Evaluation, and Reinforcement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
568<\/td>\n | Rehabilitation Scenarios for Sustainable Water Mains <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
576<\/td>\n | Transmission Main Cleaning and Lining <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
581<\/td>\n | City of Myrtle Beach Stormwater Management Master Plan and Final Design for Upgrade and Replacement of Beach Outfalls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
589<\/td>\n | Design and Dispersion Analysis for Upgrade and Replacement of Beach Outfalls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
597<\/td>\n | Pipeline Planning and Route Selection A 72-Inch Water Pipeline through a Developed Neighborhood: A Design and Construction Challenge\u2014Allen\/Plano\/Frisco\/McKinney Project A 72-Inch Pipeline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
605<\/td>\n | Challenges and Solutions for Selecting an Optimal Water Main Route <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
612<\/td>\n | Challenges and Lessons Learned on the Bliss Run Parallel Relief Storm Sewer in Columbus, Ohio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
624<\/td>\n | Piping in Tight Quarters: Special Design Challenges for Waterworks Plant Yard Piping <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
631<\/td>\n | A Guide to Route Selection for Large Diameter Pipeline Projects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
642<\/td>\n | Seismic Effect on Pipelines\/Pipeline Security and Safety Design Considerations for Large Diameter Buried Pipelines at a Water Treatment Facility with Limited Space, Large Differential Settlements, and Corrosive Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
654<\/td>\n | Dynamic Response of Continuous Buried Pipes in Seismic Areas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
661<\/td>\n | Water Rationing Model for Water Networks under Short-Term Water Supply Shortage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
672<\/td>\n | Ultimate Capacity of Welded-Slip Joints under Axial Compression <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
683<\/td>\n | Seismic Evaluation of Sweeping Bends <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
691<\/td>\n | Soil Structure Interaction Shear Behavior of Small Span Single and Double Precast Reinforced Concrete Box Culverts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
703<\/td>\n | Field Test for Buried Large Steel Pipes with Thin Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
711<\/td>\n | Improved Solution for Pipe Stiffness as Measured by Parallel-Plate Load Test Method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
720<\/td>\n | Numerical Modeling of Buried Bended Elbow-Pipeline Subjected to Lateral Ground Displacements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
732<\/td>\n | The Behavior of Buried Flexible Pipe in Peat Ground <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
740<\/td>\n | Three-Dimensional Modeling of Live Loads on Culverts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
748<\/td>\n | Statistical and 3D Numerical Identification of Pipe and Bedding Characteristics Responsible for Longitudinal Behavior of Buried Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
758<\/td>\n | Model Pit Test and DEM Analysis on Buried Pipe Subject to Lateral Loading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
766<\/td>\n | Trenchless Technology Construction Gravity Sewer Installations Using the Arrowbore Method: Case History <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
774<\/td>\n | Single Pass Micro-Tunneling Reinforced Concrete Cylinder Pipe for Pressure Flow Applications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
782<\/td>\n | Constitutive Model for High Density Polyethylene to Capture Strain Reversal <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
790<\/td>\n | Minimizing Public Exposure to Cross-Bores in Unmarked Sewer Service Laterals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
798<\/td>\n | Lower Stone Canyon Bypass Line No. 2, Los Angeles, California: Lessons Learned from Reservoir Bottom and Tunnel Pipeline Design and Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
806<\/td>\n | HDD Shore Approaches in the Biscayne Bay Marine Sanctuary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
814<\/td>\n | HDD\u2013Cartridge Method and 24-Inch (610mm) Ductile Iron Pipe Key to Minimizing Surface Disruption in Hillsborough County <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
824<\/td>\n | Combined Directional Drilling to Reduce Design and Construction Costs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
830<\/td>\n | Wastewater Rehabilitation in a NIMBY Environment: The Lake Arlington Wastewater Interceptor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
838<\/td>\n | Experiences in Adopting Trenchless Methods in China <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
846<\/td>\n | Modeling Burst Head Advance during Static Pipe Bursting <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
854<\/td>\n | The Most Cost Effective Method for Eliminating Inflow Lake Hodges to Olivenhain Pipeline Tunnel, Shaft, and Site Development: Use of ASTM A841 TMCP Steel <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Pipelines 2006<\/b><\/p>\n |